WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

Sbga109 Spring drive timing experiment

1 reading
5.5K views 31 replies 10 participants last post by  Brandon Hobbs  
#1 ·
Just received a new Orbita winder and thought I'd run a small experiment. Since a spring drive doesn't work on a timer I've set the watch to 2 o'clock synced with time.gov. I'll then let my sbga109 run on the winder for 5 days.

Hoping I get close to the advertised accuracy.

More to come...

Image


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
#6 ·
I said it doesn't work on a timer, a watch timer. Spring drives don't tick so nothing for the watch timer to count.
I guess you mean a Timegrapher, and yes it does make sense that a Timegrapher won't be able to measure the instantaneous accuracy of a Spring Drive.
 
#23 ·
Why not? I know a regular winder won't wind a Kinetic movement because a very fast rotation is necessary to charge the capacitor, but doesn't a Spring Drive just have a normal mainspring?
 
#31 ·
I've decided as I count down to a month of monitoring to check for isochronism issues by letting the watch run down 2 days and then wearing .

I seriously doubt I'll find any as I figure the engineers checked to make sure the main spring had enough torque to keep the train spinning at 8 revs at all points of wind. Worth a look though since I'm just playing anyway.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
#32 ·
So it's been a month since I've been paying attention.

Just checked, watch is 1.5 seconds fast. This is 0.05 seconds per day.

Hard to know if that beats cosc since I don't keep the watch in that much heat but pretty impressive.

Seems like the watch gained about a second over the last week. I was letting the watch run almost dead before winding. Maybe there is a touch of isochronism after all.

Other watches I put on the winder while I was paying attention: Damasko db2, +4.5/day.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk