WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

Seiko SKX - Crystal Mod or Not?

3.7K views 19 replies 12 participants last post by  SkxRobbie  
#1 ·
Hello all,

I have a Seiko SKX013 that I've owned since 2017. It's a fantastic watch and I love wearing it. The watch is in excellent condition, even though I wear it as a beater. Note: the description as a "beater" is IMHO not the best description.

Of course, one of the great things about the SKX is that there's lots of mod options. I'm considering replacing the hardlex with a sapphire crystal. For those that have done this, what are your thoughts? Is this mod worth doing? Are there any drawbacks? My biggest concern is losing the water resistance rating on the watch. I believe you can get the watch tested as long as a watchmaker has the right equipment to test. But are there any other drawbacks to a crystal swap that I'm not aware of? I appreciate your thoughts!

So - would you mod your SKX, or keep it in original condition?

Cheers!
 
#3 ·
I put sapphire on all my Seiko watches. I can scratch a hardalex crystal in less than a month. My watch guys pressure tests after each is done. I know that swapping to sapphire is a mod I really don't consider it one. I feel it makes the watch more durable for normal wear. If i was a professional diver and worked under water maybe I would leave the mineral crystal for impact resistance. Lets face it most of us wear our dive watches because we like the look of them. I also think it makes the dial pop as to me the sapphire is clearer if that makes sense.
 
#4 ·
Various positions on this so you'll get input from "both sides". My experience is that sapphire does scratch and/or chip when you least expect it so you're not really buying anything by swapping to it. If you really beat up your watches, you'll likely be better served by keeping the Hardlex as it's cheaper to replace and shouldn't shatter like sapphire can.

I recently swapped out the 7S for a 4R in my SKX and the watchmaker doing the work suggested I swap to sapphire while the watch was apart but I declined. I really saw no advantage to doing so other than being able to say "It has a sapphire crystal."

As for water resistance, there's no difference using either material as long as the crystal is the right size and an appropriate crystal gasket is installed. Pressure testing will easily show it's good after the swap if you decide to do it.

I say keep it Hardlex and don't waste the money.
 
#17 ·
Swapping the crystal to sapphire is fine. Go with a well known supplier that uses underside anti reflective coating or else it’s a step backwards in my opinion.
 
#18 ·
Thank-you all for taking the time to reply to my questions. Yes, my SKX013 is in excellent condition. There are a couple of very faint scratches on my hardlex crystal that I can only see under certain lighting and angles. But this doesn't really bother me. I was reading some reviews online and saw that some people really like the look of the double dome AR crystal (AR coated only on the inside) and thought that could look great on my SKX. I also have an Omega SMP that has a non-AR coated DD crystal and I really like it. But I keep going back and forth in my mind, thinking that it would be nice just to keep my watch OEM.

I did buy a strapcode SO bracelet years ago and it does feel substantial and looks good on the watch. But I keep going back to the jangly OEM bracelet. It's lighter, more comfortable, and I think I prefer it! I was wondering if I would do the same with the sapphire vs. hardlex.

I know - I'm the only person who can really answer my own question. How many times have I responded to posts asking members which watch to buy? My first response is to go with what you like best...LOL. However, I appreciate the feedback and welcome any comments from those who have done the swap. From your responses above, it sounds like a crystal swap won't affect the WR rating (if done properly), and the decision is more of a personal preference.

Thanks again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: One-Seventy