WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

The mechanical equivalent of a G-Shock?

19K views 55 replies 37 participants last post by  Fergfour  
#1 · (Edited)
G-Shocks have been legendary for their toughness since they were first introduced. Prior to that, Timex was famous for being less delicate than many other more expensive watches.

What mechanical (handwound or automatic) watch do you feel TODAY embodies the spirit of the G-Shock, in being able to withstand punishment, in it's ability to be worn without regard to weather or activity...a true "go to" watch that can be worn for anything the day may bring?

For the sake of discussion, lets say that our mechanical watch MUST also be affordable in the same way as a G-Shock, otherwise its not really equivalent. Therefore, we'll exclude watches over $300, which is approximately the price of the GW-5000, the "grail" for many G-Shock fans, although many popular G's cost much less than that. Sorry, fans of Submariners and AquaTerra's...however fine your watches are...their much higher price makes them much less accessible to the general public, and that accessibility is an essential part of what makes the G-Shock such a phenomenon...ANYone can afford a watch which is as close to indestructible as it's possible to make a watch.

So, in sum, the requirements for submission are as follows:

The watch MUST be driven by a spring, either wound by hand or automatic. NO quartz watches of any kind. No batteries, capacitors or electrical components of any kind.

The watch MUST display mechanical toughness and resistance to damage.

The watch MUST cost NO MORE than $300.

My nomination is the Vostok Amphibia. Designed for military use in 1967, it's continued in production ever since. Like the G-Shock, there are a wide variety of case shapes and dial designs. Cost is usually less than $100, so anyone can afford one. Using their own 31-jewel movement, it runs reliably for millions of owners worldwide. If it does break, parts are available at low cost, and you can repair it on your kitchen table. The Amphibia uses a very clever case design which seals more tightly as water pressure increases. The crown disengages from the stem when screwed down, so that if the watch is dropped, impact is not transmitted through the stem to the movement. The acrylic crystal may scratch, but is very difficult to break. The watch is rated for 200 meters, but videos online show Amphibia watches tested to below 700 meters before the crystal shatters.

 
#2 ·
Really no basis for comparison. Casio G Shock watches and watches with mechanical movements are at different ends of the reliability and ruggedness spectrum. The balance and escapement of a mechanical watch is inherently vulnerable to damage no matter the brand or price. A shock mounted digital movement with no moving parts is almost impervious to damage.
 
#45 ·
john is correct! The whole premise of this discussion is off! It is like saying find me a apple that peels and tastes like an orange, but still looks and feels like an apple! Both are fruit but different. Casio G Shock watches are a digital movement, completely different from a mechanical or automatic watch. Vance.
 
#4 ·
For mechanicals there's nothing that comes even remotely close to the G Shock when it comes to toughness but the Orient M Force has a valiant try.
As does the SKX but ultimately not as rugged and robust as a G.

This version looks ok while trying

 
#7 ·
Wyler watches are pretty good:

"Worldwide attention was attracted by a spectacular Wyler marketing campaign in 1956, when two watches were allowed to fall from the top of the Eiffel Tower and still functioned unchanged after the fall."

https://www.watch-wiki.net/index.php?title=Wyler

Another favorite sales technique was to take a Wyler off one's wrist and throw it against the wall. Still worked.
 
#39 ·
Wyler watches are pretty good . . . . .
Hardly.

At the heart of Wyler's most ambitious shock intervention was the floppy balance arm which is actually pretty rigid.

The Elgin serpentine balance arm absorbed as much energy and it's design was only incidental to its variable inertia execution.

Three legged end jewel spring designs like those of the 2416b are generally pivot killers as well.
 

Attachments

#10 ·
If quartz options were on the table, the INOX would be in play. For a mechanical, not for $300 -- you'd be looking at $800 for an Archimede Outdoor Protect, or twice that for a MĂĽhle SAR Rescue Timer.
 
#13 ·
+1 for Vostok! Love my Timex vintage mechanicals, but they are a wee delicate now. My Seiko SNZG is a nice sub-$130 beater, but lacks the personality of a sub-$80 Amphibia.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: brandon\
#14 ·
My old Invicta - tough as old boots. It's been in a draw for the last 3 or 4 years but when I looked at it (whilst cleaning out the draw) I realised that it must use the atomic clock to sync the time every 12 hours - presumably by some sort of receiver built in to the movement (though I've no idea how as have never heard of this with a mechanical watch before) - so every 12 hours the old Invicta syncs and is spot one, giving the exact time down to one millionth of a second! Can't beat that!

Can one of you techies explain how the syncing works with a mech watch please as it's baffling me.

Thanks
 
#19 · (Edited)
I should imagine those Raphael Nadal Richard Mille watches are pretty tough. They're designed to survive the huge shocks, and g-forces from serving and returning, in tennis. ( Obviously not 'affordable').



Otherwise Seiko incablock. Or realistically those 7S26, SKX movements which don't hack or wind. They're built for simplicity, reliability, and not needing servicing for ages. There's a lot less to go wrong. But I'm probably just saying that as I'm biased towards Seiko's. (Like half the people on this forum).
 
#20 ·
Isn’t this where someone is,supposed,to say the Marathon GSAR? But like the OP I like the Vostok and plan to have one in the not,too,distant future
 
#22 ·
Isn't this where someone is,supposed,to say the Marathon GSAR? But like the OP I like the Vostok and plan to have one in the not,too,distant future
No, because, just like the Richard Mille, it significantly exceeds the OP's price requirements.

I would recommend a Seiko Monster (SKX or SRP).

No mechanical watch may be as tough as a G-shock, but they won't be internally destroyed by a dead battery, either. I think it would be difficult to destroy one while actually wearing it, at least without incurring injury.

Rick "and it meets ISO 6425" Denney
 
#27 ·
Also...what price range is consider accessible?

I think it is hard to have an answer apply to everyone's affordablility. Take G-Shock brand itself as an example. G-Shock has wide range of classic digital with resin that is selling for few hundred. The newer G-Shock popular analog quartz such as MR-G, MT-G, G-Steel, the new Atomic Frogman that are selling near or over 1K. Very close to compare with Seiko Emperor Tuna.
 
#28 ·
The OP specified $300.

Rick "sticking with the Seiko Monster, which is actually ISO6425-compliant" Denney
 
  • Like
Reactions: wuyeah
#29 ·
If we are talking analog quartz then probably the Seiko Tuna. Its movement was designed with durability in mind, plus the shroud protecting the case and bezel. If we are talking mechanical, something from Bremont where the movement is mounted on an anti-shock mount, movement surrounded by an iron cage, and then the case hardened.
 
#41 ·
From ancient times, a Timex pin lever based watch was quite tough and was dirt cheap. Conversely, they're loud enough to keep you up at night and well, their use as a timekeeping mechanism is debatable.
I think the modern tractor would be something like a 7S26.

It's too expensive for your query, but I'd also throw in the Rolex 3135-based watches. To the degree we'd count spring drives, I'd be willing to bet they're unusually shock resistant as well.

But as others have pointed out, there's simply no mechanical watch that could hope to compete with a G-Shock in terms of shock resistance.
 
#43 ·
Bremont. But even those aren't designed to take the hits like a G-Shock is. No moving parts makes a big difference.