WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

When the Casio G-Shock GW-M500A originally came out?

5K views 21 replies 10 participants last post by  Raykv423  
#1 ·
Image
 
#12 ·
Thanks for posting the thread. I see quite a lot of similarity among generations, models, and lines. It's been a dream of mine to create a style taxonomic tree for G-Shocks and I can do so for specific features (e.,g., three eyes) but there are so, so many models, it's daunting.

Soon I'll be starting a thread to capture my fascinations with G-Shock design. It's such a rich domain with so many fascinating branches. There are two big problems with doing this. First, when I discover a piece I want to study, I usually try to buy it. Second, with some of these pieces pushing a quarter century or more of age, it's a race against time.

A library of dead or inert specimens just doesn't excite me as much as a functioning collection.
 
#14 ·
Thanks for posting the thread. I see quite a lot of similarity among generations, models, and lines. It's been a dream of mine to create a style taxonomic tree for G-Shocks and I can do so for specific features (e.,g., three eyes) but there are so, so many models, it's daunting.

Soon I'll be starting a thread to capture my fascinations with G-Shock design. It's such a rich domain with so many fascinating branches. There are two big problems with doing this. First, when I discover a piece I want to study, I usually try to buy it. Second, with some of these pieces pushing a quarter century or more of age, it's a race against time.

A library of dead or inert specimens just doesn't excite me as much as a functioning collection.
That was idea behind creating analog digital watches thread which i created and sustain and welcome any meaningful addition to it.

G-Shock design has all visible stages from early 80s where it was not much of individual design but copy paste from existing models in regular line and watches been utilitarian to late 80s/early 90s when what we consider current G-shocks were born. Cool, marketable and though they borrowed heavily again from existing Casio line it become independent at late 90s and it staying to be this way.

It will be interesting to discuss design and it's development. Though my few attempts here did not extent into lengthy threads.

Keeping park of older watches and keeping them running is sure complex task. Especially watches like G-shocks with plastic build and custom parts. I pass on many because unless you really love it... it better be in perfect condition. Because sometime efforts to fix it are expensive at least in Canada.
 
#17 · (Edited)
It seems like the Waveceptor/MB6 designation would be the "G" on some models, based on the small sample list below. Since they all contain W... I guess maybe the M was added to designate the newer MB6 instead of Waveceptor? It's somewhat confusing IMO.

DW-5000 - non solar/non mb6
DW-5200 - non solar/non mb6
DW-5600 - non solar/non mb6
GW-5000 - solar/mb6
GW-M5610 - solar/mb6
GW-500 - solar/waveceptor
GWM-500 - solar/mb6
 
#19 ·
It seems like the Waveceptor/MB6 designation would be the "G" on some models, based on the small sample list below. Since they all contain W... I guess maybe the M was added to designate the newer MB6 instead of Waveceptor? It's somewhat confusing IMO.

DW-5000 - non solar/non mb6
DW-5200 - non solar/non mb6
DW-5600 - non solar/non mb6
GW-5000 - solar/mb6
GW-M5610 - solar/mb6
GW-500 - solar/waveceptor
GWM-500 - solar/mb6
Yes, the M suffix was added to denote the upgrade to Multi-Band to older models. But in the case of the GW-M5610, it already had a predecessor having MB5 called the GW-M5600 so they called it the GW-M5610 to denote the upgrade to MB6.